The unanimous decision by the US Supreme Court to overturn Colorado’s top court ruling, which had prevented Donald Trump from being on the ballot due to his involvement in the events of January 6, will settle the matter regarding the former president’s eligibility to run for office across the country.
The key question revolved around the enforcement of section three of the 14th Amendment, which allows states to disqualify individuals from seeking federal office, including the presidency. State-level judges, such as those in Colorado, had cited this constitutional provision when removing Trump from ballots in response to lawsuits filed by pro-democracy organizations.
Also Read: Rain fury creates havoc in Pakistan, death toll climbs to 35 amid landslides
In their decision, the US supreme court said ‘We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency.’
A group of six voters in Colorado, comprising four Republicans and two independents, challenged Trump’s eligibility in court, portraying him as a threat to American democracy due to his alleged involvement in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack by his supporters.
This legal action was supported by the liberal watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The Supreme Court’s ruling came just before Super Tuesday, a crucial day in the US presidential primary cycle, highlighting the importance of resolving any obstacles to Trump’s candidacy appearing on the ballot in all 50 states.
The Supreme Court swiftly resolved the Colorado ballot dispute, in contrast to its slower handling of Trump’s bid for immunity from criminal prosecution in a federal case related to his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss. The Court’s decision to expedite the Colorado case involved fast-tracking arguments and issuing a written opinion in just over two months.
In contrast, the Court’s handling of Trump’s immunity case took a longer timeline, initially declining to expedite resolution before lower courts had ruled, and then agreeing to take up the matter after lower court decisions, with arguments scheduled for late April.
The Supreme Court’s conservative majority, including three justices appointed by Trump, played a pivotal role in this case, reminiscent of its involvement in the landmark Bush v. Gore case of 2000. The legal dispute centered on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Section 3, which disqualifies any “officer of the United States” engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution.
Donald Trump’s involvement in the events preceding the Capitol attack, including his inflammatory speech to supporters repeating false claims of election fraud and urging them to “fight like hell,” was cited as evidence against him. The 14th Amendment, ratified after the Civil War, aimed to prevent individuals from holding office if they engaged in actions undermining the peaceful transfer of power.
Colorado’s top court ruled against Trump, citing the political violence he allegedly incited and his role in obstructing the peaceful transfer of power, thus disqualifying him from appearing on the ballot in the state.
Read all the World News, Business News, Sports News, Entertainment News, Business News and Opinion here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
