The selection of Justice (Retd) V Ramasubramanian as the Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) by President Droupadi Murmu has sparked criticism from Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge. Both leaders had recommended alternative candidates, arguing the need for greater representation of India’s diversity and inclusiveness in the NHRC leadership.
Rahul Gandhi expressed disappointment with the selection process, labeling it as “extremely regrettable” and “pre-determined.” He emphasized the importance of diversity in the NHRC, stating, “The NHRC’s credibility and effectiveness depend on its ability to embody the diversity and inclusiveness that define India’s constitutional ethos.”
Proposed Candidates
Gandhi and Kharge had proposed names such as Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice Kuttiyil Mathew Joseph for the position of NHRC Chairperson. Highlighting their credentials, Gandhi described Nariman, a distinguished jurist from the Parsi community, as someone with “intellectual depth and unwavering commitment to constitutional values.” He added that Nariman’s inclusion would symbolize the NHRC’s dedication to representing India’s pluralistic society.
ALSO READ: PM Modi meets 101-year-old former IFS officer during Kuwait visit
Justice Kuttiyil Mathew Joseph, a Supreme Court judge renowned for his judgments supporting marginalized groups and constitutional freedoms, was also praised for his suitability for the role.
The leaders further recommended Justice Muralidhar and Justice Akil Kureshi for NHRC panel positions. Gandhi noted that Muralidhar is widely respected for his landmark rulings on custodial violence and civil liberties, while Akil Kureshi, from the Muslim minority community, was commended for his strong ethical principles and accountability in governance.
Appointments Announced
Despite these recommendations, the appointments announced on Monday included Justice (Retd) V Ramasubramanian as Chairperson, along with Justice Priyank Kanoongo and Justice (Retd) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi as members of the NHRC panel.
The Congress leaders expressed their dissatisfaction with the appointments, arguing that the selection process overlooked individuals whose inclusion could have strengthened the NHRC’s commitment to human rights and diversity.
The criticism highlights broader concerns over transparency and inclusivity in high-level appointments. As the NHRC’s new leadership takes charge, its ability to address human rights issues effectively and uphold constitutional values will remain under scrutiny.
