The Supreme Court on Monday modified its earlier order barring YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia from airing any shows and granted him permission to resume ‘The Ranveer Show’ with strict conditions regarding content standards.
A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N K Singh stated that the permission is subject to an undertaking from Allahbadia that his show will adhere to standards of decency and morality, ensuring that it remains suitable for viewers of all age groups.
Supreme Court’s Decision
“Subject to the petitioner furnishing an undertaking to the effect that his podcast shows will maintain the desired standards of decency and morality so that viewers of any age group can watch, the petitioner is allowed to resume ‘The Ranveer Show’,” the bench declared.
This ruling modifies the February 18 directive, which had prohibited Allahbadia or his associates from broadcasting any content on YouTube or other audio/visual platforms until further orders. The court had issued that order while hearing his plea seeking the consolidation of all FIRs registered against him over controversial comments made during the YouTube show ‘India’s Got Latent’.
Legal Arguments and Livelihood Concerns
Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, appearing for Allahbadia, emphasized that the complete suspension of his shows would severely impact his livelihood. He further highlighted that Allahbadia employs 280 people, making it crucial to allow the continuation of his business.
ALSO READ: Amid Ranveer Allahbadia row, Centre’s advisory to OTT platforms, ‘Adhere to code of ethics’
“I understand he has no sense of humor, but he interviews personalities from various fields—sportspersons, politicians, spiritual leaders—and that is how he earns his livelihood,” Chandrachud stated. “If this condition remains, he won’t be able to afford legal representation for himself eventually.”
Taking these arguments into account, the court modified its earlier ruling, allowing Allahbadia to continue his show while also ensuring that he remains protected from arrest until further orders.
Regulatory Framework for Online Content
The Supreme Court also broadened the scope of the case, addressing the need for a regulatory framework to manage online content without imposing direct censorship.
“With regard to telecast or airing of programs which are not acceptable in terms of known moral standards of our society, some regulatory measures may be required,” the bench observed. “We have requested the Solicitor General to suggest regulatory measures that balance fundamental rights under Article 19 while ensuring responsible content standards.”
The court further noted that any proposed regulatory framework should be open to public suggestions to ensure a fair and inclusive approach.
The Debate on Content Standards
Justice Surya Kant made a strong remark on the quality of Allahbadia’s content, stressing that humor should be enjoyable for the entire family and not rely on filthy language.
“Humor is something the entire family can enjoy, nobody should feel embarrassed. Using obscene language is not talent,” he said.
With the Supreme Court’s modified ruling, Ranveer Allahbadia can now resume his show, provided he abides by the conditions laid out by the court. Meanwhile, the regulatory debate over online content standards is set to continue, with further measures expected to be discussed in the coming weeks.
