The bail hearing for Chinmoy Krishna Das Brahmachari, a Hindu priest accused of sedition in Bangladesh, has been deferred to January 2, 2025, after no lawyer appeared in court on Tuesday to represent him. The case, which has sparked controversy and allegations of intimidation, highlights growing tensions around religious freedom and justice in the region.
International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) has alleged that Advocate Ramen Roy, a Bangladeshi lawyer defending Chinmoy Krishna Das, was “brutally attacked at his home by Islamists.”
The organization claims Roy is now in the Intensive Care Unit. On Monday, Radharamn Das, ISKCON Kolkata spokesperson, took to X (formerly Twitter) to share the incident, stating, “Please pray for Advocate Ramen Roy. His only ‘fault’ was defending Chinmoy Krishna Prabhu in court. Islamists ransacked his home and brutally attacked him, leaving him in the ICU, fighting for his life.”
However, conflicting reports from Bangladeshi legal circles have denied the occurrence of such an attack.
ALSO READ: 2nd ISKCON monk arrested in Bangladesh, says Kolkata centre
Lawyers Under Pressure?
The Bangladesh Sammilita Sanatani Jagran Jote has claimed that approximately 70 Hindu lawyers were “falsely sued in a case to prevent their participation” in representing Chinmoy Krishna Das. This allegation, published by The Business Standard, has fueled suspicions of systemic efforts to block legal representation for the accused.
This is not the first time the case has drawn international attention. Last month, rumors circulated online about a lawyer for Chinmoy Krishna Das being killed. Subsequent investigations revealed that the victim, Saiful Islam, was an assistant public prosecutor unrelated to the case.
ALSO READ: Bangladesh freezes 17 bank accounts linked to ISKCON
Next Steps
With the bail hearing now scheduled for January, the case continues to polarize opinion. Advocates for religious minorities accuse the Bangladeshi legal system of failing to provide a safe environment for fair representation, while government and legal authorities deny claims of systemic bias.
This case, amid growing international scrutiny, underscores broader concerns about the treatment of religious minorities and their advocates in Bangladesh.
