The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought clarity on the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) after elections, responding to a petition demanding that data from EVMs not be deleted even after vote counting concludes. A bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna directed that, for now, no data from EVMs should be deleted or reloaded.
The Election Commission has been asked to submit details regarding the process of burning EVM memory and microcontroller after elections. The inquiry follows concerns raised in petitions filed by the Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR), Haryana, and a group of Congress leaders, who urged the court to establish a clear policy for verifying the original burnt memory and microcontroller of EVM components.
Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna emphasized that the issue is not adversarial, stating, “If the losing candidate wants clarification, the engineer can provide an explanation that there has been no tampering.” This remark underscores the importance of ensuring transparency in the electoral process.
Petitioners Demand Verification of Burnt EVM Memory and Microcontroller
The petitioners have called for a mandated verification process where engineers examine the burnt memory and microcontroller of EVMs to confirm the absence of any tampering. This request highlights the growing demand for electoral integrity and transparency in the country’s voting system.
ALSO READ: ‘AI is the code for humanity in this century’: PM Modi at AI Summit in Paris
The Supreme Court has scheduled the next hearing for the week beginning March 3. The case is expected to bring further scrutiny to the procedures followed by the Election Commission regarding EVM data handling and post-election security measures.
As the debate over EVM security continues, stakeholders await the Election Commission’s response on the SOP governing the handling of voting machine data post-elections. The ruling could have significant implications for the future of India’s electoral process and public confidence in electronic voting.