The Lok Sabha descended into turmoil on August 20, 2025, as Union Home Minister Amit Shah tabled three controversial bills proposing the automatic removal of a prime minister, chief ministers, or ministers detained for 30 consecutive days on charges carrying a minimum five-year jail term.
The bills—namely the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization (Amendment) Bill, and the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill—triggered fierce opposition, with AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi leading the charge. His objections, met with sloganeering from opposition benches, forced the Lok Sabha Speaker to adjourn proceedings until 3 p.m.
The proposed legislation, which aims to establish a new legal framework for dismissing elected officials in custody, has ignited a heated debate over its implications for democracy and the rule of law. Critics argue it risks empowering unelected agencies, while supporters see it as a step toward accountability.
Laid the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha. pic.twitter.com/wsohG2UP6x
— Amit Shah (@AmitShah) August 20, 2025
Opposition Slams Bills as Threat to Democracy
Asaduddin Owaisi fiercely opposed the bills, warning of their potential to undermine constitutional principles. “This violates separation of powers. It gives executive agencies power to play judge, jury and executioner.
This bill would empower the unelected to play the role of the executionary,” Owaisi declared in the Lok Sabha. He further cautioned, “Sections of this bill can be used to destabilise governments. This bill is nothing but creating a gestapo,” likening the proposed measures to authoritarian tactics.
Congress MP Manish Tewari echoed these concerns, labeling the bills “squarely destructive” and a direct assault on the principle of innocence until proven guilty. “Indian constitution says there should be a rule of law, and the basis of that is that you are innocent until proven guilty.
This bill hopes to change that. It makes an executive agency officer the boss of the Prime Minister,” Tewari argued. He urged Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to allow opposition leaders to present their case against the legislation, highlighting the need for a robust debate.
New Legal Framework Sparks Controversy
The three bills introduced by Shah aim to establish a mechanism for removing elected officials, including the prime minister, chief ministers, and ministers in states and Union territories like Jammu & Kashmir, if they remain in custody for 30 days on serious charges.
Notably, the legislation allows for reappointment of dismissed officials upon their release, a provision that has done little to quell opposition fears of misuse.
ALSO READ: Union Cabinet okays Bill to regulate online gaming, may ban money gaming platforms
The bills target offences punishable by at least five years in prison, raising concerns about their potential to destabilize elected governments through targeted detentions.
The contentious introduction of these bills has intensified political tensions, with the opposition accusing the government of undermining democratic norms.
As the Lok Sabha prepares to reconvene, the debate over these measures is expected to dominate parliamentary proceedings, with far-reaching implications for India’s political landscape.
