National Medical Commission revised curriculum controversy: The National Medical Commission (NMC) has introduced a revised curriculum for undergraduate medical students, which has ignited a wave of controversy. The latest textbook, introduced as part of the changes, controversially labels sodomy and lesbianism as “unnatural sex offences.”
This characterization, along with the inclusion of topics like sexual perversions and fetishism, has drawn significant criticism from LGBTQ+ advocates and medical professionals.
The revised curriculum has been incorporated into the forensic medicine and toxicology syllabus for undergraduates. This move comes after these subjects were previously removed in 2022 following a directive from the Madras High Court. Notably, the updated content does not distinguish between consensual sex between queer individuals, which has raised alarms among those advocating for inclusivity in medical education.
Among the reintroduced topics are the hymen and its types, the medico-legal significance of virginity and defloration, and issues related to legitimacy. The curriculum also delves into sexual perversions, including sadism, voyeurism, exhibitionism, transvestism, and necrophilia, but notably omits any discussion of consensual same-sex relationships.
ALSO READ: All about West Bengal’s Aparajita bill: Death penalty, time-bound investigations and more
Another significant change in the curriculum is the removal of the seven-hour training on disability, which has prompted further concern regarding the scope of medical education under the new guidelines.
Reactions to the NMC’s Curriculum Changes
The NMC has justified the curriculum revisions by stating that they are part of an outcome-driven educational framework designed to align with global trends. The Commission aims to produce what it describes as an “Indian medical graduate” equipped with the necessary knowledge, skills, and values to serve as a competent primary care physician.
According to the NMC’s Competency-Based Medical Education Curriculum (CBME) Guidelines for 2024, “It was time to have a relook at all aspects of the various components in the existing regulations and guidelines, and adapt them to the changing demography, socio-economic context, perceptions, values, advancements in medical education and expectations of stakeholders.”
The revised curriculum places an increased emphasis on medico-legal frameworks, codes of conduct, and medical ethics, with a strong focus on the alignment and integration of subjects.
The NMC asserts that the primary care physician must be adept at providing promotive, preventative, rehabilitative, palliative care, and referral services, positioning them as the first point of contact in the healthcare system.
However, the changes have been met with significant opposition. Critics argue that the reintroduction of these topics, particularly the labeling of certain sexual orientations as “unnatural,” may perpetuate harmful stereotypes and attitudes towards marginalized communities. LGBTQ+ advocates have expressed concern that the curriculum could undermine the progress made in promoting inclusivity and understanding in medical education.
Broader Implications for Medical Education and Inclusivity
The NMC’s decision to revise the curriculum has sparked a broader debate about the role of medical education in shaping societal attitudes towards marginalized groups.
The omission of discussions on consensual queer relationships, coupled with the controversial reintroduction of topics like virginity and sexual perversions, has raised questions about the inclusivity and relevance of the new syllabus.
As the debate continues, medical professionals and advocates are calling for a reconsideration of the changes, urging the NMC to ensure that the curriculum reflects modern understandings of sexual health and inclusivity. The controversy surrounding the revised syllabus highlights the ongoing challenges in balancing traditional medical education with the evolving needs and values of contemporary society.
